One definition of “freedom” from the Cambridge Dictionary is “the state of not being in prison,” though its primary meaning is “the condition or right of being able or allowed to do, say, think, etc., whatever you want to, without being controlled or limited.” Considering these definitions together raises an intriguing question: what if someone’s freedom feels more restricted outside of prison, making them feel more liberated within it? This perspective challenges the conventional notion of freedom. Additionally, how long can someone endure increasing restrictions before responding, and would such a response be peaceful or violent?
These questions are explored in the psychological political drama Munnariyippu (Warning), directed by Venu and starring Mammootty. The film delves into the life of CK Raghavan, a middle-aged man grappling with the paradox of feeling more confined in the outside world than he did in prison.
Raghavan’s philosophical musings on freedom and confinement reveal his struggle with his past and present. “Living in constant fear is very dull. It will destroy our freedom,” he remarks in a bar, highlighting how personal definitions of freedom can vary and how societal contexts can alter our perceptions of it.
The film draws parallels with The Shawshank Redemption (1994), where Brooks Hatlen struggles to adjust to life outside prison after decades of confinement, mirroring Raghavan’s challenges. Venu’s film captures Raghavan’s internal conflict and the constraints he faces upon his release, emphasizing the psychological impact of his prolonged imprisonment.
When Anjali Arakkal, a freelance journalist, interviews Raghavan, she becomes intrigued by his story. Despite his lack of evidence proving his innocence, Raghavan’s calm demeanor and complex reflections on freedom captivate her. Anjali’s attempt to publish his story brings unintended consequences, as Raghavan’s newfound fame disrupts his life and challenges his sense of freedom.
Anjali’s treatment of Raghavan reflects a critical view of journalism and exploitation. She imposes her own vision of his life, offering him a minimalistic living space and disregarding his autonomy. Her control and manipulation underscore the film’s critique of how media and societal structures can limit individual freedom.
As the story unfolds, Raghavan’s reaction to his new circumstances becomes increasingly unsettling. His eerie calm and eventual violent act against Anjali reveal the deeper themes of freedom and consequence explored in the film.
Munnariyippu concludes with a chilling reflection on freedom and punishment, as Raghavan returns to prison, now with additional photos of those he feels wronged by. The film’s minimalistic approach, combined with Mammootty’s compelling performance, underscores its lasting impact. The themes of freedom, confinement, and the consequences of deprivation are poignantly captured through Venu’s direction, Bijibal’s music, and Beena Paul’s editing, making Munnariyippu a thought-provoking and enduring cinematic experience.
